<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Comisi&#xF3;n para la Cooperaci&#xF3;n Ambiental</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.cec.org/es/</provider_url><author_name>cecmain_adm</author_name><author_url>https://www.cec.org/es/author/cecmain_adm/</author_url><title>Trade Liberalization and the Porter Effect</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="xuE1GrBuRw"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.cec.org/es/publicaciones/trade-liberalization-and-the-porter-effect/"&gt;Trade Liberalization and the Porter Effect&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.cec.org/es/publicaciones/trade-liberalization-and-the-porter-effect/embed/#?secret=xuE1GrBuRw" width="600" height="338" title="&#xAB;Trade Liberalization and the Porter Effect&#xBB; &#x2014; Comisi&#xF3;n para la Cooperaci&#xF3;n Ambiental" data-secret="xuE1GrBuRw" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.cec.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.cec.org/wp-content/uploads/2279-trade-liberalization-and-porter-effect-en-1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>465</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>600</thumbnail_height><description>Does trade liberalization make the environment dirtier or cleaner? Theory suggests the possibility of both. Copeland and Taylor&#x2019;s (2003) composition effect changes the mix of goods produced either according to comparative advantage, or due to foreign factor inflows, particularly capital. The composition effect may or may not cause degradation of the environment in the country [&hellip;]</description></oembed>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin


Served from: www.cec.org @ 2026-04-22 21:37:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->