{"id":380,"date":"2018-02-06T08:25:36","date_gmt":"2018-02-06T13:25:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/?p=380"},"modified":"2022-03-30T16:33:27","modified_gmt":"2022-03-30T20:33:27","slug":"sustainable-trade-in-tarantulas-action-plan-for-north-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/sustainable-trade-in-tarantulas-action-plan-for-north-america\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustainable Trade in Tarantulas: Action Plan for North America"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sixteen tarantula species, comprising one from the genus\u00a0<em>Aphonopelma\u00a0<\/em>and 15 from the genus\u00a0<em>Brachypelma<\/em>, were selected as \u201cpriority tarantula species\u201d and are the subject of this action plan. Information was compiled for the species as a group, including: the impact of trade on conservation and livelihoods; making CITES non-detriment findings (NDFs); and identification challenges for CITES enforcement. The 16 species were also assessed as to their distribution, conservation status, trade and commercial value. A total of 18 recommended actions are proposed, related to: improved cooperation among North American stakeholders involved in the trade chain; government policies that promote captive-breeding and sustainable trade in Mexico; biological and trade information; and conservation and enforcement. These actions were developed based on the information compiled for this document and from consultation with stakeholders. Consultation included a stakeholder workshop held on 25\u201326 October 2016 in Mexico City.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sixteen tarantula species, comprising one from the genus\u00a0Aphonopelma\u00a0and 15 from the genus\u00a0Brachypelma, were selected as \u201cpriority tarantula species\u201d and are the subject of this action plan. Information was compiled for the species as a group, including: the impact of trade on conservation and livelihoods; making CITES non-detriment findings (NDFs); and identification challenges for CITES enforcement. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":373,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-action-plans"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":922,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380\/revisions\/922"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cec.org\/cites\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}