Close this window


Overview


Owner: Heifer International

Architect: Polk Stanley Rowland Curzon Porter Architects, Ltd.

Builder: CDI Contractors, LLC

Location: Little Rock, AR

Building type(s): Commercial offices in 5-story building

Size: 8,730 sq. meters

Project scope: New construction on brownfield site

Completion date: February 2006

Rating/awards: LEED ?
AIA/COTE Top Ten Green Projects in 2007
EPA Phoenix Award in 2006; Category/title: Excellence in Brownfield Redevelopment
Environmental Design & Construction Magazine Excellence in Design Awards in 2007; Category/title: Honorable Mention in Institutional, Nonprofit Organization, Educational, or Healthcare Category
Chicago Athenaeum American Architecture Award in 2007

Heifer International Headquarters
::Map

FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Web sites
Heifer International Website
http://www.buildinggreen.com/hpb/overview.cfm?ProjectID=781
Magazines
Circle of Life: Heifer Internationational Center, Little Rock, Ark.
by Roberts, Tristan Publication: GreenSource (January 2007) http://www.construction.com/GreenSource/projects/case_studies/
2007/0701_COL /0701_mag_COL.asp

Contacts
Reese Rowland, AIA Polk Stanley Rowland Curzon Porter Architects, Ltd.
Architect (Project designer) 700 S. Schiller Little Rock, AR 72201 501-378-0878 http://www.polkstanley.com
Photo: Heifer International

Heifer International is a non-profit organization whose mission is to work with communities to end hunger and poverty and care for the earth. The design process for the Headquarters building was inspired by villages where the community members make decisions sitting in a circle, facing each other as equals. During the Headquarters design process, members of the project team, the community, and the client made collaborative decisions in that same arrangement. A governing principle was that the building should reinforce the message that reducing poverty and hunger require stewardship of the earth. The project demonstrates that construction projects can – and should – remain true to the earth’s resources . (107 words)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

The design team performed life-cycle cost analyses for major systems and used a payback period of seven to ten years to determine the viability of sustainable features. For example, the team determined vehicle recharging stations would get little use and would not meet the acceptable payback period. Instead, the team pursued affordable alternatives, such as preferred parking for hybrid vehicles and connections to public transportation.

The building site, a former railroad yard, posed environmental challenges, but also a great opportunity to communicate Heifer's mission. Its location allows easy access to public transportation and a pedestrian district. Employees bike, walk, carpool, and even canoe to work. Blurring the property border with the neighboring building's 30-acre riverfront park creates a combined 60-acre greenbelt. Splayed parking areas paved with a permeable surface radiate out from the building with bioswales between the rows, allowing native trees and vegetation to dominate the parking area. Constructed wetlands on three sides of the building have helped turn the brownfield site into a thriving ecosystem.

The inverted roof directs rainwater to a water tower, and waterless urinals and low-flow toilets and lavatories that use graywater from building systems minimize potable water use. Moisture removed from the building as condensate is reused to cool the building.

The building was designed to use 55% less energy than a conventional building, with a focus on daylighting as the primary source of ambient light during work hours. The building's east-west axis and glazing allow for minimal electric lighting. Automatic dimmers adjust the lighting in response to daylight levels, while occupancy sensors turn lights off in unoccupied rooms.

Local materials were used whenever feasible. A steel structure was chosen because the steel factory was three blocks away and the material included 97% recycled content. The heavy timber roof was also sourced locally. An aluminum curtainwall and skin was fabricated directly across the street. The project team selected durable, low-toxicity materials for the project interior, protecting indoor air quality. Exposed-steel floor decks were left unpainted, saving money while maintaining reflectivity. Approximately 97% of materials from demolition of the existing building were recycled, and the project team recycled 75% of the building’s construction waste.